Accounting Education.com * Sponsored Link Quick Find
*
Go
  Home Register Search Help *
*
*
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
* ** Welcome
* ** News
* ** Live News
* ** Deloitte RSS Feeds
* ** International RSS Feeds
* ** Reviews
* ** Jobs
* ** Job Posting Guide
* ** Events
* ** Journals
* ** Journal Article Search
* ** AAAJ Offer - latest articles
* ** AAAJ Offer Vol 22 iss 5-8
* ** AAAJ Offer Vol 22 iss 1-4
* ** AAAJ Offer Vol 21 iss 5-8
* ** AAAJ Offer Vol 21 iss 1-4
* ** Links
* ** Library
* ** Book of the Week Archive
* ** Bookstores
* ** US Store
* ** European Store
* ** Global Store
* ** My Account
* ** Help

*
* * *

* * *
*
Login *
*
*
*
Email:
Password:
Keep me signed in on this computer unless I sign out.
Login
register Register
Forgotten your password?
*
* * *

*

ARE AUDITORS COMPROMISED BY NONAUDIT SERVICES. ASSESSING THE EVIDENCE

Journal: Contemporary Accounting Research (view standing data)
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
Season: Autumn
Month: September
Year: 2006
Start Page: 747
End Page: 760
Author(s): Jere R Francis
Ruddock, Taylor and Taylor (2006) use an earnings conservatism framework to investigate the effects of nonaudit services (NAS) oon earings conservatism, and to test whether audit quality was impaired by NAS in Australia during the 1990s. They find no evidence of differential conservatism conditional on the level of NAS fees paid to auditors, and thus conclude that NAS have no adverse effect on audit quality.
*
*
*
 

bit10 ltd.